home Ratings Rating of candidates for the presidency of Russia 2018 for today (Results)

Rating of candidates for the presidency of Russia 2018 for today (Results)

"Our country, our president, our choice!"

The preliminary ratings of the candidates for the presidency of Russia in 2018 are formed by street and telephone polls, online voting on websites. The results of voting in the elections on March 18 and official information about who won the presidential elections will appear no earlier than March 19.

In order to have the most complete picture of the chances of Russian presidential candidates to win, we publish research from several sources at once.

Voting progress on March 18 live

The results will begin broadcasting on voting day at liveas soon as the first exit polls are published.

Election 2018 - list of registered candidates

Popular ranking of presidential candidates online

Official voting on the site itop.techinfus.com/en/ launched in order to see the real rating of applicants online. Due to the peculiarity of rounding the results, there may be a discrepancy in the total amount of percent ± 1%.

Preliminary results as of 18.03.2018:

  • The popular rating of Pavel Grudinin is ∼ 58%,
  • Vladimir Putin ∼ 18%,
  • Vladimir Zhirinovsky ∼ 6%,
  • Ksenia Sobchak ∼ 6%,
  • Maxim Suraikin ∼ 5%,
  • Boris Titov ∼ 2%,
  • Grigory Yavlinsky and Sergei Baburin ∼ 2%.

Electoral ratings of candidates

Public Opinion Foundation

FOM is a non-profit organization in the structure of VTsIOM. Today the main customer of the fund's research is the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation.

Rating of candidates, list of FOMnibusWeekly poll "FOMnibus" on February 26, 2018 73 constituent entities of the Russian Federation, 3,000 respondents took part. The statistical error does not exceed 3.6%.

Vladimir Putin's rating

Imagine there are presidential elections in Russia next Sunday. Please tell me how, which politician would you vote for? (Card, one answer.)

Putin's rating

Levada Center Polls

The table shows the ratio in% of respondents who answered the question: “Which politician would you vote for if the presidential elections in Russia were held next Sunday?»

Candidates, rating01.201604.201707.201709.201711.201712.2017
Putin534866525361
Zhirinovsky3318248
Zyuganov43-236
Mironov11-<112
Sobchak----11
Yavlinsky----<11
Ekaterina Gordon-----1
Boris Titov-----<1
Shoigu21-<11-
Navalny11-11-
Medvedev<11-<1-
Others11-11-
I don't know who I would vote for1719162315-
Wouldn't vote1113-9119
I don't know if I would vote or not910-91010

The legal status of a foreign agent no longer allows the Levada Center to publish the results of research on the presidential elections.

VCIOM polls

The ratio of votes of respondents who are definitely ready to go to the elections and who answered the question: “Which candidate would you vote for in the elections if they took place next Sunday and the list looked like this?»

VTsIOM poll on February 26

CandidateJan. 10, 2018Jan. 15, 2018Jan. 28, 2018Feb 04, 2018Feb 11, 2018Feb 18, 2018Feb 26, 2018Mar 04, 2018Mar 09, 2018
V.V. Putin81.173.269.971.471.569.569.169.769
Grudinin P.N.7.66.17.26.97.37.57.87.17
Zhirinovsky V.V.4.26.15.95.75.55.35.95.65
Sobchak K.A.0.71.21.21.31.00.91.61.12
Yavlinsky G.A.0.60.80.90.70.81.40.91.01
Titov B.Yu.0.40.30.30.40.20.30.30.30
Baburin S.N.----0.50.40.30.21
Suraykin M.A.----0.10.10.10.30
I am at a loss to answer4.45.59.29.29.310.610.410.711
I will come and ruin the newsletter0.40.60.70.53.00.60.50,61

According to experts, the All-Russian Center for the Study of Public Opinion traditionally demonstrates a high level of support for the authorities, since 100% of the company's shares belong to the state.

Election turnout forecastPublished earlier anti-rating of candidates contains the names of those for whom the Russians do not want to vote in the elections.

Election results, who won

Results of the presidential elections in Russia on March 18, 2018The final rating of candidates for the presidency of Russia was published on March 19, 2018.

1016 COMMENTS

  1. Personally, I only know Vladimir Putin from among the applicants for his deeds. The rest of the applicants promise something and declare to the people a stunning increase in pensions, earnings of all kinds of benefits, but simply cannot explain how they will be able to implement this in everyday life without a real drop in the living standards of the population. We remember how one longtime presidential candidate, fortunately now deceased, PROMISED TO TREAT ON THE RAILS. And everyone immediately thought it was under the locomotive, but they were wrong! His rails were safe and even very profitable. But he lay down on the operating table of surgeon Akchurin to extend his life by ten years, although of course it's a pity. And there is nothing to blame the famous surgeon for, he still took the Oath of the Hippocrates. And on the "troubled show" called the TV debate of presidential contenders RF. Vladimir Putin is not present quite fairly and absolutely correctly. Unlike other applicants, he needs to work, not debate. And he proves his advantage over those who are eager to debate with his deeds. If he committed any non-specious deeds, then it would be immediately visible. And then K. Sobchak accused V.V. Putin of creating a totalitarian system in the country and did not bring up and did not create conditions for the education of mass opposition in Russia. ... Hearing this, I thought it was time for her to see a psychiatrist. And give her power over the country, what will she do with it? She hardly knows that. And our country is completely democratic, otherwise there would not be so many applicants with a desire to lead it. But personally, I do not see any worthy contender in these people, except for Vladimir Putin. As they say FROM GOOD, GOOD IS NOT LOOKING FOR!

    • Sobchak is absolutely right about the opposition. Development is impossible without opposition. it is an axiom.

  2. Putin cynically spat in the face of all Russians - cursing that the next
    He will appoint Medvedev for 6 years. (((
    Vova is the smartest - on all sweepstakes, put all your loot on
    Grudinin and withdraw his candidacy the day before the elections!

    • And you, berry, from which field? If Putin does his job, then Grudinin will only study, but for now he only reads other people's term papers from the stands!

  3. I evaluate a person not by words, but by deeds. What did Putin do? Communal services, gasoline, taxes, beggarly pensions, insignificant education, no medicine, a gang of thieves feeding on their allotments. And what for the people? Shish and even without oil. The people survive as best they can. Adapts and survives. Shame for a great power! Crimea missiles and so on is of course a good thing, no doubt, but there is one small but. Why do I need all this without a decent life? What did the sternum do? It is enough to look at the school and kindergarten in his estate and everything is immediately clear. Not to mention everything else. I'll just say that the comparison is not in favor of Putin. My choice is Grudinin.

    • There are many such kindergartens in Russia. And schools are no worse.By the way, it was not built with the money of this fake collective farm. Yes, and transferred to the balance sheet of Moscow. That this is his fiefdom - no one doubts. Only a shitty owner will launch his personal courtyard. If you read his program, did you pay attention to point 19? It clearly states that it is planned to create a state committee that will not be subject to the president. And no presidential decree will be implemented without the approval of this committee. Do you know who will be on this committee? Zyuganov, Khodorkovsky, Navalny and many more similar "elite" on the godep's salary. Those. - all the power of America! And the president will just be "CARDBOARD". If now Putin has a team in the opinion of "beggars, destitute, hungry" - all thieves, then what kind of team will Grudinin have? It's like "x ... on x ... change, just waste time."

    • Nina. Dear Nina, have you at least seen a school or a kindergarten, for example? Lots of? Where at least show one. And the children of ordinary collective farmers study there, if that is so. You dear to me about the State Department do not weave. here no one is going to vote for the State Department. for the bulk of Khodorkovsky and other ... brothers all the more. Here Zyuganov really how sideways got here is not clear) The people will vote for Grudinin, because they are tired of being hungry and destitute beggars. And all these delights of life your wonderful Putin gave us. he had enough time to prove otherwise, but nothing changes for the better. so a nice person in our ears ... .. will not work once again about the wonderful Putin. the main thing is that you have the audacity to prove the opposite. the degree of insolence just rolls over. I'll tell you so from Putin to keep power, there are two options, either to eliminate Sternin, or to falsify the elections. There is also the option of canceling the elections in connection with some state of emergency. And so he has no chance. And it was not for America that the people were blown up, so that it became completely clear to you, otherwise I see you in confusion, but just saw a candidate in whom you can still believe and who can correct the situation for the better. Putin proved by his actions that he is not going to do anything for the people. his vertical of power is worthless, in positions of thieves, in intellect, dullness, mediocrity, conceit above the roof, but in fact, zero.

  4. Those who are in power are throwing mud at the business executive, which means a good candidate - you have to be heady.
    For Grudinin!

  5. Only the enemy can dislike his people like that. Down with Putin! The people were driven into poverty. Lulls the people with fairy tales. Only those close to Putin are getting richer from oil and gas (the property of the people, by the way), but they are pulling three skins from the people, they no longer know what to think of in order to rip off the next tax. Soon we will pay tax for air and for trampling the land! State duties are growing by leaps and bounds. Maybe it's enough to endure such humiliation already.

    • I completely agree. Democracy in Russia has been replaced by totalitarian oligarchism. But I propose to vote for Zhirinovsky, even though we’ll laugh)) (

  6. Before you vote for Putin, think-is it worth it? Look at the information, listen to the opinions of different people, Nemtsov, Maltsev, General Petrov, Sulakshin, Boldyrev, Navalny, Girkin, Fedorov. Analyze, fold the mosaic. You don't need to have kaleidoscopic knowledge.
    For 18 years, Putin has essentially done nothing sensible for the country, and this is a fact. If he is elected for another 6 years, then part of the land will go to China and Japan - and this will be his last KU. Now we have a unique chance to make the right decision.

    • And you list what Putin has done over the years of his presidency. Or won't you get paid for that?;)

  7. One cannot but overestimate Putin's actions at the start of his presidency. He pulled the country out of a deep crisis, when there were half-empty shelves, wild inflation and salary arrears reached 6-9 months. But then he served the Motherland and the people. In those days, small business began to slowly raise its head, which is now being stifled by local officials, and this is not only about corruption, but about the fact that local bureaucrats impose costly conditions, if not fulfilled, the business will be closed. Now he serves the interests of individual close persons, squeezing the last juices out of ordinary people. Perhaps he decided to beat the tsar's terms of office, maybe there are other reasons, but Vladimir Vladimirovich, it’s probably time to leave and leave beautifully! Give way to the young and energetic, as they once gave it to you…. for Grudinin!

  8. HE (Putin) does not steal anything from the people. He only promises well. But his entourage and, of course, friends (Rotenbergs, Usmnovs) are hindering to translate what he promises into real deeds. They took out (after grabbing from the people) a trillion dollars, while not building anything and creating nothing for the people. But with what frenzy they all, like syavki, attacked Grudinir, accusing him of all sins. Now, if all this thieving retinue in direct proportion to what was stolen, created for the people, what Grudinin did would not be a country. a FLOWERING GARDEN. Grudinin said very correctly: “The President of the country should not have such thieving friends. No one will believe the president of his words that he is fighting corruption, have such an environment. We must, as he said, BEGIN with ourselves! " And Lukashenka expressed this idea even more bluntly (as he always does): "You yourself will not steal, no one will steal." Remember the PHENOMENON of Singapore. As soon as the president put his brother in jail and the corruption died. So you want the media belonging to the oligarchs to praise Grudinin after such direct calls to the thieves of the people's deputy?

Comments are closed.

itop.techinfus.com/en/

Technics

Sport

Nature