The preliminary ratings of the candidates for the presidency of Russia in 2018 are formed by street and telephone polls, online voting on websites. The results of voting in the elections on March 18 and official information about who won the presidential elections will appear no earlier than March 19.
In order to have the most complete picture of the chances of Russian presidential candidates to win, we publish research from several sources at once.
Voting progress on March 18 live
The results will start broadcasting on voting day at liveas soon as the first exit poll data is published.
→ Election 2018 - list of registered candidates ←
Popular ranking of presidential candidates online
Official voting on the site itop.techinfus.com/en/ launched in order to see the real rating of applicants online. Due to the peculiarity of rounding the results, there may be a discrepancy in the total amount of percent ± 1%.
Preliminary results as of 18.03.2018:
- The popular rating of Pavel Grudinin is ∼ 58%,
- Vladimir Putin ∼ 18%,
- Vladimir Zhirinovsky ∼ 6%,
- Ksenia Sobchak ∼ 6%,
- Maxim Suraykin ∼ 5%,
- Boris Titov ∼ 2%,
- Grigory Yavlinsky and Sergey Baburin ∼ 2%.
Electoral ratings of candidates
Public Opinion Foundation
FOM is a non-profit organization within the structure of VTsIOM. Today the main customer of the fund's research is the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation
Weekly survey "FOMnibus" on February 26, 2018 73 constituent entities of the Russian Federation, 3,000 respondents took part. The statistical error does not exceed 3.6%.
Vladimir Putin's rating
Imagine there are presidential elections in Russia next Sunday. Please tell me how, which politician would you vote for? (Card, one answer.)
Levada Center Polls
The table shows the ratio in% of respondents who answered the question: “Which politician would you vote for if the presidential elections in Russia were held next Sunday?»
| Candidates, rating | 01.2016 | 04.2017 | 07.2017 | 09.2017 | 11.2017 | 12.2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Putin | 53 | 48 | 66 | 52 | 53 | 61 |
| Zhirinovsky | 3 | 3 | 18 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| Zyuganov | 4 | 3 | - | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Mironov | 1 | 1 | - | <1 | 1 | 2 |
| Sobchak | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 |
| Yavlinsky | - | - | - | - | <1 | 1 |
| Ekaterina Gordon | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| Boris Titov | - | - | - | - | - | <1 |
| Shoigu | 2 | 1 | - | <1 | 1 | - |
| Navalny | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
| Medvedev | <1 | 1 | - | <1 | – | - |
| Others | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
| I don’t know who I would vote for | 17 | 19 | 16 | 23 | 15 | - |
| Wouldn't vote | 11 | 13 | - | 9 | 11 | 9 |
| I don't know if I would vote or not | 9 | 10 | - | 9 | 10 | 10 |
The legal status of a foreign agent no longer allows the Levada Center to publish the results of research on the presidential elections.
VCIOM polls
The ratio of votes of respondents who are definitely ready to go to the elections and who answered the question: “Which candidate would you vote for in the elections if they took place next Sunday and the list looked like this?»
| Candidate | Jan. 10, 2018 | Jan. 15, 2018 | Jan. 28, 2018 | Feb 04, 2018 | Feb 11, 2018 | Feb 18, 2018 | Feb 26, 2018 | Mar 04, 2018 | Mar 09, 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V.V. Putin | 81.1 | 73.2 | 69.9 | 71.4 | 71.5 | 69.5 | 69.1 | 69.7 | 69 |
| Grudinin P.N. | 7.6 | 6.1 | 7.2 | 6.9 | 7.3 | 7.5 | 7.8 | 7.1 | 7 |
| Zhirinovsky V.V. | 4.2 | 6.1 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.5 | 5.3 | 5.9 | 5.6 | 5 |
| Sobchak K.A. | 0.7 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 2 |
| Yavlinsky G.A. | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1 |
| Titov B.Yu. | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0 |
| Baburin S.N. | - | - | - | - | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1 |
| Suraykin M.A. | - | - | - | - | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0 |
| I am at a loss to answer | 4.4 | 5.5 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 9.3 | 10.6 | 10.4 | 10.7 | 11 |
| I will come and ruin the newsletter | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0,6 | 1 |
According to experts, the All-Russian Center for the Study of Public Opinion traditionally demonstrates a high level of support for the authorities, since 100% of the company's shares belong to the state.
Published earlier anti-rating of candidates contains the names of those for whom the Russians do not want to vote in the elections.
Election results, who won
The final rating of candidates for the presidency of Russia was published on March 19, 2018.
I will vote for the Sternum P N If they wet him with all their might, it means Zyuganov GA did not miss.
I am from the countryside. To the regional center 50 km. The roads are terrible. There is no work. The school is no longer average. You can go on and on. Dear Russians, help bring back the "BAD" communists. After all, the truth was better with them. Only for Grudinin P.N.
If for the communists, then for Suraykin
Grudinin is a self-centered cattle, unable to say anything except that he has a wonderful life on the state farm. Why is this grief populist so running away from correspondents, but because he can not say anything besides his slogan, and for the same reason he fled from the debate ...
If Pukin remains in power, then I will leave this country.
It is high time! Give me money in loans! I'll run too! - Damn! I already ran away!
You can already pack your suitcase and bring down))
adam your place in edam
for another 6 years of Putin and Russia will become a colony of Jewish capital
I see only one president - respected Putin V.V. and point !!!
and the rest of the presidential candidates are also good, but they will not be able to defend Russia !!! ... Only V.V. Putin can do this.
We vote for Zhirinovsky, this is the only person who lives in politics. Yes, and already got enough of it. Yes hot-tempered. But no one will put a stick in the wheels of Russia with him. Really climb. I AM FOR ZHIRINOVSKY.
Rather, glue the flippers.
He's not a politician, he's a clown.
Zhenya you are a fool. Banging your head against the wall can moan easier. As a doctor, I advise you.
I agree with the opinion of those who support P.N. Grudinin. And I can also confirm for sure that elections have always been unfair, I also worked in commissions at PECs. Sheer deception!
I worked at the PEC for 8 years and there was no deception there. Observers from parties always stood nearby. And when voting, and when counting votes.
And I saw in 2012 how the cops were sitting at the PEC and covering their eyes when the same "roundabout dances" were spinning in front of their noses for two hours in a row, waving blank passport covers, because they voted for their "dad" - VVP. And observers from other parties in a number of localities and cities are "fake": they, too, just need to sit and get their money for the sake of appearance. For money, some people are ready to sell their own mother! I saw it! I think it is necessary to introduce some kind of protection system against such situations. Citizens need to be active, to somehow take control of this problem.
but Grudinin deceived people with apartments! I'm not going to head for him
I, too, was on the commission once, there were observers from the communists and Zhirinovsky, everyone together filled in extra ballots for the ep ....
And all the observers, in the end, are for Edro, although they represent other parties. They also took part, saw and know.
Having looked at the achievements at the Leninsky state farm and hoping that it will be so throughout the country, I will vote for Grudinin! The only worthy oppositionist, a person from the common people, lives under the same roof with the workers and understands how to motivate people to improve the economy in the country!
I am 58 years old, raised 3 sons. Throughout her adult life, she did not have anything good for her beloved, but only gave and gave everything. Two of the three sons were taught in the 2000s for a fee. Only for training in those years, my husband and I gave about 100 thousand rubles.I have a higher pedagogical education, I don't drink, I don't smoke. But for all my merits, I have never been in the center of our Motherland - Moscow. I believe that I was robbed by the state in the person of Yeltsin, Putin, who pursued and are pursuing a policy to impoverish the people.
Nobody robbed you.
Work on.
She herself chose a profession.
We know your dormitories - teachers! And what are you doing there
Putin's next speech on March 1, 2018 is another brainwashing. If you want to understand what the point is, remember Putin's 2012 decrees. NOT ONE ORDER IS FULFILLED. At the same time, one cannot refer to the unfavorable conjuncture, to the fall in oil prices. It is clear that during 6 years of the presidency, our economy has not got off the oil needle, and this was stated in the decrees of 2012. Further, as the President popularly explained to us on March 1, nothing will move for the better, the question is whether to build new weapons systems and "scare" the whole world with this, or to achieve economic growth, pensions, life expectancy, affordable medicine, high-quality education, etc. It is clear that Grudinin is not an ideal either, but the hope for a change in course, for economic growth in the interests of the people is connected with him. All other candidates pose no danger to the anti-popular regime. Therefore, for Grudinin!
Yes, the groan of the people burst out, since in reality it was a country that defeated fascism, we were the first to fly into space, the largest territory with immense depths, everywhere we built temples, everyone prays to God, and human life is not worth anything. As one person said, “Apparently they know something about us, if they allow themselves to do it with us. Now, as once the real question is WHAT TO DO, and this is not an easy question for the Russians. One thing must be understood here, that no one will just give it away, whether it is stolen or honestly earned, everyone will fall under the distribution and this must be understood and accepted. Most likely there are two variants of events - either we will get rid of the ridges and we, I have to introduce common people, we will close our mouths for 20 years, or Mrs. Citizen. It's not about the horror of catching up, but about the realities. After all, the raw materials sector is not ours, not Russian, Financial, Agrarian, Pharmaceuticals, Education and it is scary to continue, and the Uncles from overseas did not just invest money, so the real question is WHAT TO DO.